Family Law Dispute Valuation
Iconic website, community based business, including critique of a third party valuation report. Business later sold for ~$50m
Family Law Dispute Valuation
Transportation business (revenue ~$100m) for litigation.Including detailed critique of a third party valuation report with multiple entities
Family Law Dispute Valuation
Professional services business for a matrimonial settlement, other side advised by Big 4 accounting firm
Family Law Dispute Valuation
Specialised medical supplies business including a detailed critique of a third party valuation report
Family Law Dispute Valuation
Specialised medical supplies business including a detailed critique of a third party valuation report
Family Law Dispute Valuation
Valuation and subsequent critique of opposing valuation report – retail business
Family Law Dispute Valuation
Valuation experts report, updated report and critique of opposing report – financial planning businesses
Family Law Dispute Valuation
Single expert – valuation of small restaurant & takeaway shop
Family Law Dispute Valuation
Critique of jointly appointed expert due to dissatisfaction by one party
Family Law Dispute Under-Valued Example
We were appointed as a shadow expert in a divorce proceeding as the client and their lawyers were not satisfied with the jointly appointed valuer’s report. It turned out that the business was grossly under-valued the business. Our valuation of around $2m was well researched and justified, compared to the original $350,000 valuation, which had very little justification and supporting analysis. We also provided a critique, briefed counsel & was cross examined in Federal Court.
Family Law Dispute Over – Valued Example
We were engaged to provide a critique and found that the original report grossly overvalued the business by almost 100%. Our critique identified a range of fundamental valuation issues:
- Did not consider most current financial information
- Relied on averaging historical earnings instead of considering maintainable earnings
- Failed to consider the business & industry had significantly deteriorated (re GFC)
- Did not perform industry research or speak to management about industry trends
- Did not understand or factor in some of the major business risks
Family Law Dispute – Start Ups and Unprofitable Businesses
Engaged to value a business with very little historical results as it was in the start up phase. A DCF was used as the primary methodology to analyse potential value, however in this case there was no value (forecast losses).
Engaged to value businesses where the business has been unprofitable either because it is new or due to major changes in the business. Careful consideration of both past and expected future results are made, including the risk factors to form a view on the value of the business.